Tennis head to head
D. Medvedev vs J-L. Struff head to head
D. Medvedev leads 2–0 in 2 recorded meetings. Records count completed matches and retirements; walkovers are listed but not counted.
Record
| Player | Rank | Wins | Sets won | Games won |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATP #5 | 2 | 4 | 28 | |
| ATP #37 | 0 | 1 | 20 |
By surface
| Surface | Meetings | D. Medvedev | J-L. Struff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 0 |
Meetings
| Date | Tournament | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATP Shanghai | D. Medvedev | 2–1 | |
| ATP Beijing | D. Medvedev | 2–0 |
Player comparison
Recorded results up to · 17:12 CETD. Medvedev
#5 · Age 30 · World
17–3J-L. Struff
#37 · Age 36 · Germany
12–6Last 20 · all courts · 20/20 / 18/20 matches available
Green marks the favorable figure, not a prediction.
| D. Medvedev | Selected matches | J-L. Struff |
|---|---|---|
Serve19 / 18 recorded matches | ||
| 68.7% · favorable recorded figure | Serve points won | 67.9% |
| 78.5% | 1st serve points won | 80.3% · favorable recorded figure |
| 49.0% · favorable recorded figure | 2nd serve points won | 48.6% |
| 88.5% · favorable recorded figure | Service games won | 87.7% |
| 10.7 | Aces / match | 11.6 · favorable recorded figure |
| 3.0 | Double faults / match ↓ | 2.7 · favorable recorded figure |
Return19 / 18 recorded matches | ||
| 40.4% · favorable recorded figure | Return points won | 33.5% |
| 27.4% · favorable recorded figure | Return games won | 17.4% |
PressureSample per value | ||
| 70.7% · favorable recorded figuren=16 | Break points saved | 68.1%n=17 |
| 39.0% · favorable recorded figuren=19 | Break points converted | 37.4%n=17 |
| 3–3 · 50%n=6 | Tie-breaks won | 7–3 · favorable recorded figure · 70%n=6 |
FormSelected matches | ||
| 17–3 · favorable recorded figuren=20 | Match record | 12–6n=18 |
| 13–0 · favorable recorded figuren=13 | After winning set 1 | 10–4n=14 |
| 3–3n=6 | After losing set 1 | 2–2n=4 |
| 5–0 · favorable recorded figuren=5 | Deciding sets | 3–4n=7 |
SurfacesVerified courts · selected matches | ||
| 3–2 | Hard | 5–2 · favorable recorded figure |
Oldest → latest · same selected matches
More statistics
| D. Medvedev | Same window | J-L. Struff |
|---|---|---|
| 66.6% | First serves in | 61.7% |
| 31.8% · favorable recorded figure | 1st serve return points won | 24.6% |
| 56.4% · favorable recorded figure | 2nd serve return points won | 48.8% |
| 54.0% · favorable recorded figure | Total points won | 51.2% |
| 57.9% · favorable recorded figure | Total games won | 52.9% |
| 26.3 | Winners / match | 32.9 · favorable recorded figure |
| 20.1 · favorable recorded figure | Unforced errors / match ↓ | 28.2 |
Court distance is measured on court, not travel between venues. Distance and speed require three measured matches per player; their averages use measured matches only.
Season & career records
Separate annual scope. Only profiles observed before this match are included; these records do not change with the recent-match filter. Recorded years may be incomplete.
Singles won–lost · recorded years may be incomplete.
| D. Medvedev | Year | J-L. Struff |
|---|---|---|
| 546–232 · favorable recorded figure | Recorded career | 525–427 |
| 52–19 · favorable recorded figure | 2026 | 27–26 |
| 41–23 · favorable recorded figure | 2025 | 27–30 |
| 46–21 · favorable recorded figure | 2024 | 30–21 |
| 66–18 · favorable recorded figure | 2023 | 45–24 |
| 45–19 · favorable recorded figure | 2022 | 23–22 |
| 60–12 · favorable recorded figure | 2021 | 27–29 |
| 31–11 · favorable recorded figure | 2020 | 14–16 |
| 59–21 · favorable recorded figure | 2019 | 35–30 |
| 53–25 · favorable recorded figure | 2018 | 27–27 |
| 28–28 | 2017 | 41–33 · favorable recorded figure |
| 52–23 · favorable recorded figure | 2016 | 50–30 |
| 12–10 · favorable recorded figure | 2015 | 33–33 |
| 1–1 | 2014 | 42–28 |
| 0–1 | 2013 | 45–33 |
| no data | 2012 | 42–21 |
| no data | 2011 | 13–18 |
| no data | 2010 | 4–6 |
Doubles records
Doubles won–lost · recorded years may be incomplete.
| D. Medvedev | Year | J-L. Struff |
|---|---|---|
| 31–48 | Recorded career | 170–155 · favorable recorded figure |
| 3–2 · favorable recorded figure | 2026 | 4–3 |
| 0–2 | 2025 | 2–4 |
| 2–5 | 2024 | 9–2 · favorable recorded figure |
| no data | 2023 | 3–5 |
| 3–3 | 2022 | 14–8 · favorable recorded figure |
| 2–3 | 2021 | 9–12 · favorable recorded figure |
| 1–3 | 2020 | 14–9 · favorable recorded figure |
| 5–5 | 2019 | 20–20 |
| 2–5 | 2018 | 36–22 · favorable recorded figure |
| 3–6 | 2017 | 11–15 · favorable recorded figure |
| 7–9 | 2016 | 14–11 · favorable recorded figure |
| 3–3 · favorable recorded figure | 2015 | 13–16 |
| 0–1 | 2014 | 11–10 |
| no data | 2013 | 7–10 |
| 0–1 | 2012 | 1–6 |
| no data | 2011 | 2–2 |
Samples & availability
Only results observed as finished up to now are eligible. Unverified historical versions are excluded. Some historical observations were not recorded before this match; they are not reconstructed from later totals. Partial windows are shown honestly, without filling from another court or older matches.
Court is known for 5/20 / 7/18 selected matches. Indoor means a verified indoor court; unknown is not outdoor. Retirement outcomes remain in form, but partial-match performance is excluded. Rates use recorded point totals when complete, otherwise mean match rates. A 0/0 rate is undefined, not zero.
Travel distance, height, handedness and weekly ranking history: not available in this comparison. Values without a pre-start observation remain missing; we do not substitute current career or season totals.