Tennis head to head
H. Casanova vs W. Leite head to head
H. Casanova leads 2–0 in 2 recorded meetings. Records count completed matches and retirements; walkovers are listed but not counted.
Record
| Player | Rank | Wins | Sets won | Games won |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATP #429 | 2 | 4 | 27 | |
| ATP #674 | 0 | 1 | 19 |
By surface
| Surface | Meetings | H. Casanova | W. Leite |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 0 |
Meetings
| Date | Tournament | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Santa Cruz 2 | H. Casanova | 2–0 | |
| Antofagasta | H. Casanova | 2–1 |
Player comparison
Recorded results up to · 18:13 CETH. Casanova
#429 · Age 32 · Argentina
2–3W. Leite
#674 · Age 35 · Brazil
1–4Last 5 · all courts · 5/5 / 5/5 matches available
Green marks the favorable figure, not a prediction.
| H. Casanova | Selected matches | W. Leite |
|---|---|---|
Serve4 recorded matches each | ||
| 58.9% · favorable recorded figure · 178/302 | Serve points won | 58.1% · 175/301 |
| 61.7% · 150/243 | 1st serve points won | 67.7% · favorable recorded figure · 107/158 |
| 47.5% · 28/59 | 2nd serve points won | 47.6% · favorable recorded figure · 68/143 |
| 70.6% · favorable recorded figure · 36/51 | Service games won | 66.7% · 30/45 |
| 0.0 | Aces / match | 3.0 · favorable recorded figure |
| 0.8 · favorable recorded figure | Double faults / match ↓ | 2.8 |
Return4 recorded matches each | ||
| 36.1% · 122/338 | Return points won | 39.6% · favorable recorded figure · 105/265 |
| 20.8% · 11/53 | Return games won | 28.3% · favorable recorded figure · 13/46 |
PressureSample per value | ||
| 48.3% · 14/29n=4 | Break points saved | 63.4% · favorable recorded figure · 26/41n=4 |
| 39.3% · 11/28n=4 | Break points converted | 54.2% · favorable recorded figure · 13/24n=4 |
| 0–1 · 0%n=1 | Tie-breaks won | no data |
FormSelected matches | ||
| 2–3 · favorable recorded figuren=5 | Match record | 1–4n=5 |
| 1–1n=2 | After winning set 1 | 1–1n=2 |
| 1–2n=3 | After losing set 1 | 0–2n=2 |
| 1–2n=3 | Deciding sets | 0–1n=1 |
SurfacesVerified courts · selected matches | ||
| 2–1 · favorable recorded figure | Clay | 1–2 |
Oldest → latest · same selected matches
More statistics
| H. Casanova | Same window | W. Leite |
|---|---|---|
| 79.5% · 4 matches | First serves in | 53.8% · 4 matches |
| 29.8% · 65/218 | 1st serve return points won | 34.9% · favorable recorded figure · 53/152 |
| 48.0% · favorable recorded figure · 60/125 | 2nd serve return points won | 47.8% · 54/113 |
| 46.9% · 300/640 | Total points won | 49.5% · favorable recorded figure · 280/566 |
| 45.2% · 47/104 | Total games won | 47.3% · favorable recorded figure · 43/91 |
Court distance is measured on court, not travel between venues. Distance and speed require three measured matches per player; their averages use measured matches only.
Season & career records
Separate annual scope. Only profiles observed before this match are included; these records do not change with the recent-match filter. Recorded years may be incomplete.
Singles won–lost · recorded years may be incomplete.
| H. Casanova | Year | W. Leite |
|---|---|---|
| 285–216 · favorable recorded figure | Recorded career | 212–283 |
| 24–19 · favorable recorded figure | 2026 | 23–21 |
| 46–23 · favorable recorded figure | 2025 | 21–31 |
| 32–24 · favorable recorded figure | 2024 | 19–32 |
| 29–27 · favorable recorded figure | 2023 | 25–33 |
| 43–22 · favorable recorded figure | 2022 | 30–31 |
| 45–32 · favorable recorded figure | 2021 | 16–24 |
| 7–5 · favorable recorded figure | 2020 | 4–11 |
| 10–9 | 2019 | 19–12 · favorable recorded figure |
| 15–13 · favorable recorded figure | 2018 | 6–9 |
| 8–11 | 2017 | 9–12 · favorable recorded figure |
| 6–6 · favorable recorded figure | 2016 | 6–13 |
| 0–3 | 2015 | 3–10 · favorable recorded figure |
| no data | 2014 | 3–16 |
| 0–2 | 2013 | 9–9 |
| 20–19 · favorable recorded figure | 2012 | 18–18 |
| 0–1 | 2011 | 1–1 |
Doubles records
Doubles won–lost · recorded years may be incomplete.
| H. Casanova | Year | W. Leite |
|---|---|---|
| 130–111 · favorable recorded figure | Recorded career | 69–97 |
| 17–8 · favorable recorded figure | 2026 | 4–2 |
| 21–16 | 2025 | 10–6 · favorable recorded figure |
| 18–16 · favorable recorded figure | 2024 | 5–8 |
| 11–15 · favorable recorded figure | 2023 | 5–12 |
| 23–15 · favorable recorded figure | 2022 | 8–17 |
| 33–20 · favorable recorded figure | 2021 | 20–20 |
| 3–2 · favorable recorded figure | 2020 | 6–10 |
| 0–1 | 2019 | 0–1 |
| 1–5 | 2018 | no data |
| 1–3 | 2017 | no data |
| 0–2 | 2016 | 0–2 |
| 0–2 | 2015 | 3–5 |
| no data | 2014 | 3–6 |
| no data | 2013 | 2–4 |
| 2–4 | 2012 | 0–2 |
| 0–2 | 2011 | 3–2 |
Samples & availability
Only results observed as finished up to now are eligible. Unverified historical versions are excluded. Some historical observations were not recorded before this match; they are not reconstructed from later totals. Partial windows are shown honestly, without filling from another court or older matches.
Court is known for 3/5 / 3/5 selected matches. Indoor means a verified indoor court; unknown is not outdoor. Retirement outcomes remain in form, but partial-match performance is excluded. Rates use recorded point totals when complete, otherwise mean match rates. A 0/0 rate is undefined, not zero.
Travel distance, height, handedness and weekly ranking history: not available in this comparison. Values without a pre-start observation remain missing; we do not substitute current career or season totals.