Tennis head to head
L. Romero Gormaz vs P. Hercog head to head
L. Romero Gormaz leads 2–0 in 2 recorded meetings. Records count completed matches and retirements; walkovers are listed but not counted.
Record
| Player | Rank | Wins | Sets won | Games won |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTA #111 | 2 | 4 | 31 | |
| WTA #200 | 0 | 1 | 15 |
By surface
| Surface | Meetings | L. Romero Gormaz | P. Hercog |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clay | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 |
Meetings
Player comparison
Recorded results up to · 19:28 CETL. Romero Gormaz
#111 · Age 24 · Spain
4–1P. Hercog
#200 · Age 35 · Slovenia
3–2Last 5 · all courts · 5/5 / 5/5 matches available
Green marks the favorable figure, not a prediction.
| L. Romero Gormaz | Selected matches | P. Hercog |
|---|---|---|
Serve5 recorded matches each | ||
| 55.6% · 224/403 | Serve points won | 57.6% · favorable recorded figure · 156/271 |
| 63.7% · favorable recorded figure · 144/226 | 1st serve points won | 62.8% · 108/172 |
| 45.2% · 80/177 | 2nd serve points won | 48.5% · favorable recorded figure · 48/99 |
| 63.9% · favorable recorded figure · 39/61 | Service games won | 61.9% · 26/42 |
| 3.4 · favorable recorded figure | Aces / match | 2.0 |
| 5.0 | Double faults / match ↓ | 1.2 · favorable recorded figure |
Return5 recorded matches each | ||
| 47.4% · 220/464 | Return points won | 48.9% · favorable recorded figure · 129/264 |
| 45.2% · 28/62 | Return games won | 50.0% · favorable recorded figure · 21/42 |
PressureSample per value | ||
| 60.0% · favorable recorded figure · 33/55n=5 | Break points saved | 57.9% · 22/38n=4 |
| 46.7% · 28/60n=5 | Break points converted | 55.3% · favorable recorded figure · 21/38n=5 |
| 1–1 · 50%n=2 | Tie-breaks won | 1–0 · 100%n=1 |
FormSelected matches | ||
| 4–1 · favorable recorded figuren=5 | Match record | 3–2n=5 |
| 2–0n=2 | After winning set 1 | 3–1n=4 |
| 2–1n=3 | After losing set 1 | 0–1n=1 |
| 2–0n=2 | Deciding sets | 0–1n=1 |
SurfacesVerified courts · selected matches | ||
| 4–1 · favorable recorded figure | Clay | 3–2 |
Oldest → latest · same selected matches
More statistics
| L. Romero Gormaz | Same window | P. Hercog |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0% · 5 matches | First serves in | 66.0% · 5 matches |
| 41.3% · 123/298 | 1st serve return points won | 46.6% · favorable recorded figure · 69/148 |
| 58.3% · favorable recorded figure · 98/168 | 2nd serve return points won | 53.4% · 63/118 |
| 51.2% · 444/867 | Total points won | 53.3% · favorable recorded figure · 285/535 |
| 54.5% · 67/123 | Total games won | 56.0% · favorable recorded figure · 47/84 |
Court distance is measured on court, not travel between venues. Distance and speed require three measured matches per player; their averages use measured matches only.
Season & career records
Separate annual scope. Only profiles observed before this match are included; these records do not change with the recent-match filter. Recorded years may be incomplete.
Singles won–lost · recorded years may be incomplete.
| L. Romero Gormaz | Year | P. Hercog |
|---|---|---|
| 232–168 · favorable recorded figure | Recorded career | 374–332 |
| 44–28 · favorable recorded figure | 2026 | 27–22 |
| 29–31 | 2025 | 11–9 · favorable recorded figure |
| 49–31 · favorable recorded figure | 2024 | 22–15 |
| 27–33 | 2023 | 24–15 · favorable recorded figure |
| 45–20 · favorable recorded figure | 2022 | 3–5 |
| 28–18 · favorable recorded figure | 2021 | 16–24 |
| 10–7 · favorable recorded figure | 2020 | 11–10 |
| no data | 2019 | 34–26 |
| no data | 2018 | 22–22 |
| no data | 2017 | 20–8 |
| no data | 2016 | 16–23 |
| no data | 2015 | 34–27 |
| no data | 2014 | 17–20 |
| no data | 2013 | 25–14 |
| no data | 2012 | 20–26 |
| no data | 2011 | 34–27 |
| no data | 2010 | 28–26 |
| no data | 2009 | 10–9 |
| no data | 2008 | 0–3 |
| no data | 2007 | 0–1 |
Doubles records
Doubles won–lost · recorded years may be incomplete.
| L. Romero Gormaz | Year | P. Hercog |
|---|---|---|
| 96–73 · favorable recorded figure | Recorded career | 45–60 |
| 6–6 | 2026 | 1–0 |
| 8–10 | 2025 | no data |
| 23–10 | 2024 | no data |
| 15–14 | 2023 | no data |
| 34–20 | 2022 | no data |
| 8–10 · favorable recorded figure | 2021 | 1–4 |
| 2–3 | 2020 | no data |
| no data | 2019 | 0–1 |
| no data | 2018 | 0–4 |
| no data | 2016 | 0–2 |
| no data | 2015 | 0–1 |
| no data | 2014 | 0–1 |
| no data | 2013 | 5–3 |
| no data | 2012 | 2–4 |
| no data | 2011 | 10–16 |
| no data | 2010 | 16–14 |
| no data | 2009 | 6–7 |
| no data | 2008 | 3–2 |
| no data | 2007 | 1–1 |
Samples & availability
Only results observed as finished up to now are eligible. Unverified historical versions are excluded. Partial windows are shown honestly, without filling from another court or older matches.
Court is known for 5/5 / 5/5 selected matches. Indoor means a verified indoor court; unknown is not outdoor. Retirement outcomes remain in form, but partial-match performance is excluded. Rates use recorded point totals when complete, otherwise mean match rates. A 0/0 rate is undefined, not zero.
Travel distance, height, handedness and weekly ranking history: not available in this comparison. Values without a pre-start observation remain missing; we do not substitute current career or season totals.