Tennis head to head
F. Mena vs N. Kicker head to head
Level at 1–1 in 2 recorded meetings. Records count completed matches and retirements; walkovers are listed but not counted.
Record
By surface
| Surface | Meetings | F. Mena | N. Kicker |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | 1 |
Meetings
| Date | Tournament | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Santa Cruz 2 | N. Kicker | 2–0 | |
| Buenos Aires 3 | F. Mena | 2–0 |
Player comparison
Recorded results up to · 16:29 CETF. Mena
#193 · Age 34 · Argentina
1–4N. Kicker
#336 · Age 34 · Argentina
3–2Last 5 · all courts · 5/5 / 5/5 matches available
Green marks the favorable figure, not a prediction.
| F. Mena | Selected matches | N. Kicker |
|---|---|---|
Serve4 / 5 recorded matches | ||
| 59.7% · 175/293 | Serve points won | 62.5% · favorable recorded figure · 198/317 |
| 64.7% · 110/170 | 1st serve points won | 68.6% · favorable recorded figure · 153/223 |
| 53.6% · favorable recorded figure · 67/125 | 2nd serve points won | 47.9% · 45/94 |
| 70.2% · 33/47 | Service games won | 80.0% · favorable recorded figure · 40/50 |
| 3.8 · favorable recorded figure | Aces / match | 1.8 |
| 3.0 | Double faults / match ↓ | 2.0 · favorable recorded figure |
Return4 / 5 recorded matches | ||
| 39.5% · 126/319 | Return points won | 41.8% · favorable recorded figure · 127/304 |
| 25.0% · 12/48 | Return games won | 32.7% · favorable recorded figure · 16/49 |
PressureSample per value | ||
| 46.2% · 12/26n=4 | Break points saved | 58.3% · favorable recorded figure · 14/24n=5 |
| 32.4% · 12/37n=4 | Break points converted | 45.7% · favorable recorded figure · 16/35n=5 |
| 0–1 · 0%n=1 | Tie-breaks won | no data |
FormSelected matches | ||
| 1–4n=5 | Match record | 3–2 · favorable recorded figuren=5 |
| 1–2n=3 | After winning set 1 | 3–0 · favorable recorded figuren=3 |
| 0–1n=1 | After losing set 1 | 0–2n=2 |
| 0–2n=2 | Deciding sets | 1–0n=1 |
SurfacesVerified courts · selected matches | ||
| 0–1 | Clay | 3–1 |
Oldest → latest · same selected matches
More statistics
| F. Mena | Same window | N. Kicker |
|---|---|---|
| 57.3% · 4 matches | First serves in | 71.0% · 5 matches |
| 35.4% · favorable recorded figure · 74/209 | 1st serve return points won | 34.5% · 67/194 |
| 47.7% · 53/111 | 2nd serve return points won | 55.8% · favorable recorded figure · 63/113 |
| 49.2% · 301/612 | Total points won | 52.3% · favorable recorded figure · 325/621 |
| 47.4% · 45/95 | Total games won | 56.6% · favorable recorded figure · 56/99 |
Court distance is measured on court, not travel between venues. Distance and speed require three measured matches per player; their averages use measured matches only.
Season & career records
Separate annual scope. Only profiles observed before this match are included; these records do not change with the recent-match filter. Recorded years may be incomplete.
Singles won–lost · recorded years may be incomplete.
| F. Mena | Year | N. Kicker |
|---|---|---|
| 339–279 | Recorded career | 314–244 · favorable recorded figure |
| 35–21 · favorable recorded figure | 2026 | 23–23 |
| 25–27 | 2025 | 51–30 · favorable recorded figure |
| 51–24 · favorable recorded figure | 2024 | 10–13 |
| 31–21 · favorable recorded figure | 2023 | 11–10 |
| 35–29 · favorable recorded figure | 2022 | 27–28 |
| 29–30 | 2021 | 59–21 · favorable recorded figure |
| 3–10 | 2020 | no data |
| 28–21 | 2019 | no data |
| 4–5 · favorable recorded figure | 2018 | 10–14 |
| 17–16 | 2017 | 34–28 · favorable recorded figure |
| 20–20 | 2016 | 47–32 · favorable recorded figure |
| 13–13 · favorable recorded figure | 2015 | 18–19 |
| 11–9 · favorable recorded figure | 2014 | 7–9 |
| 6–3 · favorable recorded figure | 2013 | 2–5 |
| 17–22 | 2012 | 15–11 · favorable recorded figure |
| 14–8 | 2011 | 0–1 |
Doubles records
Doubles won–lost · recorded years may be incomplete.
| F. Mena | Year | N. Kicker |
|---|---|---|
| 128–133 · favorable recorded figure | Recorded career | 54–70 |
| 20–13 · favorable recorded figure | 2026 | 8–9 |
| 23–10 · favorable recorded figure | 2025 | 4–7 |
| 17–13 | 2024 | 0–2 |
| 5–4 | 2023 | 7–3 · favorable recorded figure |
| 10–13 | 2022 | 2–2 · favorable recorded figure |
| 12–15 | 2021 | 6–7 · favorable recorded figure |
| 3–7 | 2020 | no data |
| 13–15 | 2019 | no data |
| 0–2 | 2018 | 1–2 |
| 9–6 · favorable recorded figure | 2017 | 4–6 |
| 4–9 | 2016 | 8–14 · favorable recorded figure |
| 1–5 | 2015 | 10–11 · favorable recorded figure |
| 1–5 | 2014 | 2–2 · favorable recorded figure |
| no data | 2013 | 1–1 |
| 4–7 · favorable recorded figure | 2012 | 1–4 |
| 6–9 | 2011 | no data |
Samples & availability
Only results observed as finished up to now are eligible. Unverified historical versions are excluded. Some historical observations were not recorded before this match; they are not reconstructed from later totals. Partial windows are shown honestly, without filling from another court or older matches.
Court is known for 1/5 / 4/5 selected matches. Indoor means a verified indoor court; unknown is not outdoor. Retirement outcomes remain in form, but partial-match performance is excluded. Rates use recorded point totals when complete, otherwise mean match rates. A 0/0 rate is undefined, not zero.
Travel distance, height, handedness and weekly ranking history: not available in this comparison. Values without a pre-start observation remain missing; we do not substitute current career or season totals.